Improved redshifts for SDSS quasar spectra
Paul C. Hewett (1), Vivienne Wild (2) ((1) IoA Cambridge, (2) IAP, Paris)

TL;DR
This paper presents a systematic analysis of redshift estimation methods for SDSS quasars, significantly reducing biases and providing more accurate redshifts for large quasar samples.
Contribution
It introduces new empirical relationships and a revised redshift catalogue with substantially lower systematic biases compared to previous SDSS values.
Findings
Redshift biases reduced by a factor of ~20
Systematic errors lowered to Dz/(1+z)<10^-4
Redshift errors include reproducibility and intrinsic variation
Abstract
A systematic investigation of the relationship between different redshift estimation schemes for more than 91000 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 6 (DR6) is presented. The publicly available SDSS quasar redshifts are shown to possess systematic biases of Dz/(1+z)>=0.002 (600km/s) over both small (dz~0.1) and large (dz~1) redshift intervals. Empirical relationships between redshifts based on i) CaII H & K host galaxy absorption, ii) quasar [OII] 3728, iii) [OIII] 4960,5008 emission, and iv) cross-correlation (with a master quasar template) that includes, at increasing quasar redshift, the prominent MgII 2799, CIII] 1908 and CIV 1549 emission lines, are established as a function of quasar redshift and luminosity. New redshifts in the resulting catalogue possess systematic biases a factor of ~20 lower compared to the SDSS redshift values; systematic effects are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
