Two-Orbital Model Explains the Higher Transition Temperature of the Single-Layer Hg-Cuprate Superconductor Compared to That of the La-Cuprate Superconductor
Hirofumi Sakakibara, Hidetomo Usui, Kazuhiko Kuroki, Ryotaro Arita,, Hideo Aoki

TL;DR
This study uses a two-orbital model to explain why single-layer Hg-cuprates have higher transition temperatures than La-cuprates, revealing the role of the $d_{z^2}$ orbital in suppressing superconductivity.
Contribution
It introduces a two-orbital model including the $d_{z^2}$ orbital to explain the material dependence of $T_c$ in cuprates, resolving previous theoretical-experimental discrepancies.
Findings
The $d_{z^2}$ orbital contribution is stronger in La-cuprates.
The $d_{z^2}$ orbital suppresses d-wave superconductivity.
The model explains the difference in $T_c$ between Hg- and La-cuprates.
Abstract
In order to explore the reason why the single-layered cuprates, La(Sr/Ba)CuO ( 40K) and HgBaCuO ( 90K), have such a significant difference in , we study a two-orbital model that incorporates the orbital on top of the orbital. It is found, with the fluctuation exchange approximation, that the orbital contribution to the Fermi surface, which is stronger in the La system, works against d-wave superconductivity, thereby dominating over the effect of the Fermi surface shape. The result resolves the long-standing contradiction between the theoretical results on Hubbard-type models and the experimental material dependence of in the cuprates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
