A Methodology for Empirical Quality Assessment of Object-Oriented Design
Devpriya Soni, Namita Shrivastava, M. Kumar

TL;DR
This paper proposes a methodology combining controlled experimentation and Logical Scoring of Preferences to empirically evaluate the overall quality of object-oriented designs.
Contribution
It introduces a novel methodology for empirical quality assessment of object-oriented design using specific experimental and scoring techniques.
Findings
Effective evaluation of design quality achieved
Methodology applicable to different design cases
Provides a structured approach for quality measurement
Abstract
The direct measurement of quality is difficult because there is no way we can measure quality factors. For measuring these factors, we have to express them in terms of metrics or models. Researchers have developed quality models that attempt to measure quality in terms of attributes, characteristics and metrics. In this work we have proposed the methodology of controlled experimentation coupled with power of Logical Scoring of Preferences to evaluate global quality of four object-oriented designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Research · Software Reliability and Analysis Research · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
