Second Comment on "Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values" [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]
F. De Zela

TL;DR
This paper critiques a proposed quantum test for noncontextual models, demonstrating that a known Kochen-Specker model can explain all outcomes, thus challenging the test's conclusiveness against noncontextual realism.
Contribution
It shows that the Kochen-Specker model can account for all results in the proposed test, questioning its effectiveness in ruling out noncontextual hidden variable theories.
Findings
Kochen-Specker model explains all test outcomes
Proposed test is inconclusive against noncontextual models
Challenges the validity of the original testing proposal
Abstract
I examine Pan and Home's reply to my Comment on their proposal for testing noncontextual models. I show that the Kochen-Specker model for a qubit does explain all outcomes of a test based on such a proposal, so that it would be inconclusive about the untenability of realistic, noncontextual models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
