The matricial relaxation of a linear matrix inequality
J. William Helton, Igor Klep, Scott McCullough

TL;DR
This paper introduces a matrix variable relaxation for linear matrix inequalities, providing semidefinite programming solutions to domination and equivalence questions, and connects these to classical problems like complete positivity.
Contribution
It develops a relaxation method for LMIs that simplifies domination and equivalence questions into semidefinite programs, and extends Positivstellensatz results for polynomial positivity.
Findings
Domination and equivalence questions reduce to semidefinite programs.
A characterization of LMI domination via matrix completely positive maps.
A new Putinar-type Positivstellensatz for polynomials positive on bounded sets.
Abstract
Given linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) L_1 and L_2, it is natural to ask: (Q1) when does one dominate the other, that is, does L_1(X) PsD imply L_2(X) PsD? (Q2) when do they have the same solution set? Such questions can be NP-hard. This paper describes a natural relaxation of an LMI, based on substituting matrices for the variables x_j. With this relaxation, the domination questions (Q1) and (Q2) have elegant answers, indeed reduce to constructible semidefinite programs. Assume there is an X such that L_1(X) and L_2(X) are both PD, and suppose the positivity domain of L_1 is bounded. For our "matrix variable" relaxation a positive answer to (Q1) is equivalent to the existence of matrices V_j such that L_2(x)=V_1^* L_1(x) V_1 + ... + V_k^* L_1(x) V_k. As for (Q2) we show that, up to redundancy, L_1 and L_2 are unitarily equivalent. Such algebraic certificates are typically called…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
