Reply to Comment on "Nonmagnetic Impurity Resonances as a Signature of Sign-Reversal Pairing in FeAs-based Superconductors"
Degang Zhang
TL;DR
This paper addresses a comment on previous work about nonmagnetic impurity resonances as indicators of sign-reversal pairing in FeAs-based superconductors, clarifying and defending the original findings.
Contribution
It provides a detailed response to critiques, reaffirming the validity of nonmagnetic impurity resonance signatures as evidence for sign-reversal pairing.
Findings
Reaffirms the original interpretation of impurity resonances
Clarifies misconceptions raised in the comment
Supports the use of impurity resonances as a diagnostic tool
Abstract
This is a reply to the comment by Daghofer and Moreo.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIron-based superconductors research · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis