Alignment of Brightest Cluster Galaxies with their Host Clusters

TL;DR

This study confirms that Brightest Cluster Galaxies tend to align with their host clusters' major axes, with stronger alignment in more dominant, richer, and lower redshift clusters, indicating a link to hierarchical merging.

Contribution

It provides the first large-scale statistical analysis of BCG-cluster alignment across different cluster properties and redshifts, confirming the alignment's dependence on dominance, richness, and redshift.

Findings

BCGs are preferentially aligned with their clusters' major axes.

Stronger alignment observed in more dominant and richer clusters.

Alignment decreases with increasing redshift.

Abstract

We examine the alignment between Brightest Cluster Galaxies (BCGs) and their host clusters in a sample of 7031 clusters with 0.08<z<0.44 found using a matched-filter algorithm and an independent sample of 5744 clusters with 0.1<z<0.3 selected with the maxBCG algorithm, both extracted from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6 imaging data. We confirm that BCGs are preferentially aligned with the cluster's major axis; clusters with dominant BCGs (>0.65 mag brighter than the mean of the second and third ranked galaxies) show stronger alignment than do clusters with less dominant BCGs at the 4.4 sigma level. Rich clusters show a stronger alignment than do poor clusters at the 2.3 sigma level. Low redshift clusters (z<0.26) show more alignment than do high redshift (z>0.26) clusters, with a difference significant at the 3.0 sigma level. Our results do not depend on the algorithm used to select the cluster sample, suggesting that they are not biased by systematics of either algorithm. The correlation between BCG dominance and cluster alignment may be a consequence of the hierarchical merging process which forms the cluster. The observed redshift evolution may follow from secondary infall at late redshifts.