Arbitrage Opportunities in Misspecified Stochastic volatility Models
Rudra P. Jena, Peter Tankov

TL;DR
This paper investigates arbitrage opportunities arising from model misspecification in stochastic volatility models, providing strategies to maximize arbitrage profits and reinterpretations of classical options in this context.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for identifying arbitrage in misspecified stochastic volatility models and offers new insights into classical options as near-optimal arbitrage strategies.
Findings
Explicit arbitrage strategies are derived for misspecified models.
Classical butterfly and risk reversal options are shown to be near-optimal arbitrage tools.
Numerical examples demonstrate the strategies' effectiveness including transaction costs.
Abstract
There is vast empirical evidence that given a set of assumptions on the real-world dynamics of an asset, the European options on this asset are not efficiently priced in options markets, giving rise to arbitrage opportunities. We study these opportunities in a generic stochastic volatility model and exhibit the strategies which maximize the arbitrage profit. In the case when the misspecified dynamics is a classical Black-Scholes one, we give a new interpretation of the classical butterfly and risk reversal contracts in terms of their (near) optimality for arbitrage strategies. Our results are illustrated by a numerical example including transaction costs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
