Is Extra Mixing Really Needed in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars?
Amanda I. Karakas, Simon W. Campbell, Richard J. Stancliffe

TL;DR
This study shows that extra mixing in first giant branch stars can explain the observed chemical abundances in AGB stars, but its efficiency and effects vary with metallicity and require further investigation into intershell compositions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the same extra mixing processes in FGB stars can account for AGB star abundances, highlighting the need to explore intershell compositions further.
Findings
Extra mixing explains low C/N and 12C/13C ratios in FGB and AGB stars.
Models match C abundances in C-rich stars and silicon carbide grains.
Increased 16O intershell abundance reproduces isotopic ratios in evolved stars.
Abstract
(Abridged) We demonstrate that the amount of extra mixing required to fit the observed low C/N and 12C/13C ratios in first giant branch (FGB) stars is also sufficient to explain the C and N abundances of Galactic AGB stars. We simulate the effect of extra mixing on the FGB by setting the composition of the envelope to that observed in low-mass FGB stars, and then evolve the models to the tip of the AGB. The inclusion of FGB extra mixing compositional changes has a strong effect on the C and N abundance in our AGB models, leading to compositions consistent with those measured in Galactic C-rich stars. The composition of the models is also consistent with C abundances measured in mainstream silicon carbide grains. While our models cover the range of C abundances measured in C stars in NGC 1846, we cannot simultaneously match the composition of the O and C-rich stars. Our models only match…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
