The mass assembly of galaxy groups and the evolution of the magnitude gap

TL;DR

This study uses simulations to explore how the magnitude gap between brightest galaxies indicates early galaxy group formation, revealing limitations of current fossil group definitions in identifying early-formed systems.

Contribution

It introduces an alternative magnitude gap criterion that better identifies early-formed galaxy groups and analyzes the temporal evolution of fossil groups.

Findings

Large magnitude gaps often indicate early assembly but are not definitive.

Most fossil groups lose their fossil status within 4 Gyr due to new galaxy assembly.

Alternative criteria can improve identification of early-formed groups.

Abstract

We investigate the assembly of groups and clusters of galaxies using the Millennium dark matter simulation and the associated gas simulations and semi-analytic catalogues of galaxies. In particular, in order to find an observable quantity that could be used to identify early-formed groups, we study the development of the difference in magnitude between their brightest galaxies to assess the use of magnitude gaps as possible indicators. We select galaxy groups and clusters at redshift z=1 with dark matter halo mass M(R200) > 1E13/h Msun, and trace their properties until the present time (z=0). We consider only the systems with X-ray luminosity L_X> 0.25E42/h^2 erg/s at z=0. While it is true that a large magnitude gap between the two brightest galaxies of a particular group often indicates that a large fraction of its mass was assembled at an early epoch, it is not a necessary condition. More than 90% of fossil groups defined on the basis of their magnitude gaps (at any epoch between 0<z<1) cease to be fossils within 4 Gyr, mostly because other massive galaxies are assembled within their cores, even though most of the mass in their haloes might have been assembled at early times. We show that, compared to the conventional definition of fossil galaxy groups based on the magnitude gap Delta m(12)> 2 (in the R-band, within 0.5R200 of the centre of the group), an alternative criterion Delta m(14)>2.5 (within the same radius) finds 50% more early-formed systems, and those that on average retain their fossil phase longer. However, the conventional criterion performs marginally better at finding early-formed groups at the high-mass end of groups. Nevertheless, both criteria fail to identify a majority of the early-formed systems.