A measure of individual role in collective dynamics
Konstantin Klemm, M. Angeles Serrano, Victor M. Eguiluz, Maxi San, Miguel

TL;DR
This paper introduces a dynamical influence measure that quantifies how individual nodes affect collective behavior in complex systems, considering both network structure and dynamics, improving identification of key players.
Contribution
It proposes a new measure of dynamical influence that captures the interplay between network structure and dynamics, advancing the identification of influential nodes in collective systems.
Findings
Dynamical influence correlates with spreading capabilities.
It effectively identifies key nodes in diffusive processes.
The measure improves control strategies in complex networks.
Abstract
Identifying key players in collective dynamics remains a challenge in several research fields, from the efficient dissemination of ideas to drug target discovery in biomedical problems. The difficulty lies at several levels: how to single out the role of individual elements in such intermingled systems, or which is the best way to quantify their importance. Centrality measures describe a node's importance by its position in a network. The key issue obviated is that the contribution of a node to the collective behavior is not uniquely determined by the structure of the system but it is a result of the interplay between dynamics and network structure. We show that dynamical influence measures explicitly how strongly a node's dynamical state affects collective behavior. For critical spreading, dynamical influence targets nodes according to their spreading capabilities. For diffusive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
