Measuring the Reduced Shear

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that the Zhang (2008) method accurately measures reduced shear at the second order in the presence of PSF, achieving sub-percent accuracy by addressing noise and pixel size constraints in weak lensing measurements.

Contribution

It provides a mathematically rigorous method for second-order shear measurement that does not rely on galaxy or PSF morphology assumptions, with detailed noise analysis.

Findings

Zhang (2008) method measures reduced shear exactly at second order with PSF.

Background photon noise can be effectively removed, residual errors are below 0.1%.

Source Poisson noise must be controlled to less than 1/80 of source flux for sub-percent accuracy.

Abstract

Neglecting the second order corrections in weak lensing measurements can lead to a few percent uncertainties on cosmic shears, and becomes more important for cluster lensing mass reconstructions. Existing methods which claim to measure the reduced shears are not necessarily accurate to the second order when a point spread function (PSF) is present. We show that the method of Zhang (2008) exactly measures the reduced shears at the second order level in the presence of PSF. A simple theorem is provided for further confirming our calculation, and for judging the accuracy of any shear measurement method at the second order based on its properties at the first order. The method of Zhang (2008) is well defined mathematically. It does not require assumptions on the morphologies of galaxies and the PSF. To reach a sub-percent level accuracy, the CCD pixel size is required to be not larger than 1/3 of the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the PSF. Using a large ensemble (> 10^7) of mock galaxies of unrestricted morphologies, we find that contaminations to the shear signals from the noise of background photons can be removed in a well defined way because they are not correlated with the source shapes. The residual shear measurement errors due to background noise are consistent with zero at the sub-percent level even when the amplitude of such noise reaches about 1/10 of the source flux within the half-light radius of the source. This limit can in principle be extended further with a larger galaxy ensemble in our simulations. On the other hand, the source Poisson noise remains to be a cause of systematic errors. For a sub-percent level accuracy, our method requires the amplitude of the source Poisson noise to be less than 1/80 ~ 1/100 of the source flux within the half-light radius of the source, corresponding to collecting roughly 10^4 source photons.