Are debris disks self-stirred?
G. M. Kennedy, M. C. Wyatt

TL;DR
This study investigates whether debris disks are self-stirred by planet formation or influenced by planets, finding that narrow belts with radii between 15-120AU best explain observed trends and that planetary perturbations also play a role.
Contribution
It demonstrates that debris disks are likely narrow belts stirred by planet formation or planetary perturbations, challenging the idea of extended disks and emphasizing the importance of detailed imaging.
Findings
Debris disks are best modeled as narrow belts between 15-120AU.
Population models with narrow belts reproduce observed excess trends.
Planetary perturbations can also explain disk structures, as seen in specific systems.
Abstract
This paper considers the evidence that debris disks are self-stirred by the formation of Plutos. A model for the dust produced during self-stirring is applied to statistics for A stars. As there is no significant difference between excesses of A-stars <50Myr old, we focus on reproducing the broad trends, the "rise and fall" of the fraction of stars with excesses. Using a population model, we find that the statistics and trends can be reproduced with a self-stirring model of planetesimal belts with radii distributed between 15-120AU. Disks must have this 15AU minimum radius to show a peak in disk fraction, rather than a monotonic decline. Populations of extended disks with fixed inner and/or outer radii fail to fit the statistics, due mainly to the slow 70um evolution as stirring moves further out in the disk. This conclusion, that debris disks are narrow belts, is independent of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
