Further constraining galaxy evolution models through the Size Function of SDSS Early-type galaxies
Francesco Shankar (1), Federico Marulli (2), Mariangela Bernardi (3),, Michael Boylan-Kolchin (1), Xinyu Dai (4), Sadegh Khochfar (5) (1-MPA, 2-U., Bologna, 3-UPENN, 4-U. Oklahoma, 5-MPE)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how well current galaxy formation models reproduce the observed size distribution of early-type galaxies, identifying specific discrepancies and potential causes to refine theoretical understanding.
Contribution
It demonstrates that hierarchical models can match the peak of the size function but overpredict extreme sizes, highlighting areas for model improvement.
Findings
Models reproduce the size distribution peak but overpredict very compact and large galaxies.
The size-mass relation in models is flatter than observed, especially for low-mass galaxies.
Discrepancies are smaller for ultracompact galaxies when considering elliptical-dominated samples.
Abstract
We discuss how the effective radius Phi(Re) function (ERF) recently worked out by Bernardi et al. (2009) represents a new testbed to improve the current understanding of Semi-analytic Models of Galaxy formation. In particular, we here show that a detailed hierarchical model of structure formation can broadly reproduce the correct peak in the size distribution of local early-type galaxies, although it significantly overpredicts the number of very compact and very large galaxies. This in turn is reflected in the predicted size-mass relation, much flatter than the observed one, due to too large (~3 kpc) low-mass galaxies (<10^11 \msun), and to a non-negligible fraction of compact (< 0.5-1 kpc) and massive galaxies (> 10^11 \msun). We also find that the latter discrepancy is smaller than previously claimed, and limited to only ultracompact (Re < 0.5 kpc) galaxies when considering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
