Deriving Relationship Between Semantic Models - An Approach for cCSP
Shamim H. Ripon, Michael Butler

TL;DR
This paper establishes a formal connection between operational and denotational semantics for cCSP by deriving traces from operational rules and proving their correspondence, strengthening the language's formal foundation.
Contribution
It presents a novel method to derive denotational semantics from operational semantics for cCSP, demonstrating their equivalence.
Findings
Operational and trace semantics are shown to be equivalent for cCSP
Traces are extracted from operational rules using induction
The approach enhances the formal understanding of cCSP semantics
Abstract
Formal semantics offers a complete and rigorous definition of a language. It is important to define different semantic models for a language and different models serve different purposes. Building equivalence between different semantic models of a language strengthen its formal foundation. This paper shows the derivation of denotational semantics from operational semantics of the language cCSP. The aim is to show the correspondence between operational and trace semantics. We extract traces from operational rules and use induction over traces to show the correspondence between the two semantics of cCSP.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Natural Language Processing Techniques
