How do galaxies acquire their mass?
A. Cattaneo (1, 2, and 3), G. A. Mamon (4, 5), K. Warnick (3), A., Knebe (3, 6) ((1) LAM, Marseille, (2) CRAL Lyon, (3) AIP Potsdam, (4) IAP,, Paris, (5), Astro & BIPAC, Oxford, (6) Univ. Autonoma, Madrid)

TL;DR
This paper presents a toy model that explains galaxy mass acquisition by incorporating gas accretion suppression mechanisms and stellar feedback, successfully reproducing observed galaxy mass functions and distributions across different masses and redshifts.
Contribution
The model integrates multiple feedback processes into a single equation and demonstrates its effectiveness in matching observed galaxy properties and evolution.
Findings
Reproduces the present-day stellar mass function of galaxies.
Predicts a bimodal distribution of stellar masses for given halo mass.
Shows that mergers dominate growth for galaxies with stellar mass > 10^11 M_Sun/h.
Abstract
We introduce a toy model that describes (in a single equation) the mass in stars as a function of halo mass and redshift. Our model includes the suppression of gas accretion from gravitational shock heating and AGN jets mainly for M_halo > M_shock ~ 10^12 M_Sun and from a too hot IGM onto haloes with v_circ < 40 km/s, as well as stellar feedback that drives gas out of haloes mainly with v_circ < 120 km/s. We run our model on the merger trees of the haloes and subhaloes of a high-resolution dark matter cosmological simulation. The galaxy mass is taken as the maximum between the mass given by the model and the sum of the masses of its progenitors (reduced by tidal stripping). Designed to reproduce the present-day stellar mass function of galaxies, our model matches fairly well the evolution of the cosmic stellar density. It leads to the same z=0 relation between central galaxy stellar and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
