On the diffusive propagation of warps in thin accretion discs
G. Lodato (1,2), D. Price (3,4) ((1) Dipartimento di Fisica,, Universita' Degli Studi di Milano, (2) Isaac Newton Institute for, Mathematical Studies, Cambridge (3) Centre for Stellar, Planetary, Astrophysics, Monash University (4) School of Physics, University of Exeter)

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution simulations to reconcile the discrepancy between analytic theories and numerical results on warp propagation in thin accretion discs, confirming the theory's validity under certain conditions.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that with improved simulation techniques, the analytic predictions of warp diffusion in accretion discs are confirmed, resolving previous discrepancies.
Findings
Excellent agreement between simulations and theory for small warps and low viscosity.
Diffusion coefficient inversely proportional to viscosity for small amplitude warps.
Non-linear warps show a diffusion coefficient dependent on radius and time, smaller than standard values.
Abstract
In this paper we revisit the issue of the propagation of warps in thin and viscous accretion discs. In this regime warps are know to propagate diffusively, with a diffusion coefficient approximately inversely proportional to the disc viscosity. Previous numerical investigations of this problem (Lodato & Pringle 2007) did not find a good agreement between the numerical results and the predictions of the analytic theories of warp propagation, both in the linear and in the non-linear case. Here, we take advantage of a new, low-memory and highly efficient SPH code to run a large set of very high resolution simulations (up to 20 million SPH particles) of warp propagation, implementing an isotropic disc viscosity in different ways, to investigate the origin of the discrepancy between the theory and the numerical results. Our new and improved analysis now shows a remarkable agreement with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
