Gamma-ray excess from a stacked sample of high- and intermediate-frequency peaked blazars observed with the MAGIC telescope
MAGIC Collaboration: J. Aleksi\'c (1), L. A. Antonelli (2), P., Antoranz (3), M. Backes (4), C. Baixeras (5), J. A. Barrio (6), D. Bastieri, (7), J. Becerra Gonz\'alez (8), W. Bednarek (9), A. Berdyugin (10), K. Berger, (10), E. Bernardini (11), A. Biland (12), O. Blanch (1)

TL;DR
This study stacked observations of 21 blazars observed with MAGIC, revealing a significant gamma-ray excess at energies above 150 GeV, indicating a faint, persistent gamma-ray emission from these sources.
Contribution
First to perform a stacking analysis on non-detected blazars with MAGIC, uncovering evidence for a faint, steady gamma-ray signal across the sample.
Findings
Evidence for a 4.9 sigma gamma-ray excess in stacked data
The excess corresponds to a flux of about 1.5% of the Crab Nebula
The gamma-ray emission appears steady over the observation period
Abstract
Between 2004 and 2009 a sample of 28 X-ray selected high- and intermediate-frequency peaked blazars with a X-ray flux larger than 2 uJy at 1 keV in the redshift range from 0.018 to 0.361 was observed with the MAGIC telescope at energies above 100 GeV. Seven among them were detected and the results of these observations are discussed elsewhere. Here we concentrate on the remaining 21 blazars which were not detected during this observation campaign and present the 3 sigma (99.7 %) confidence upper limits on their flux. The individual flux upper limits lie between 1.6 % and 13.6 % of the integral flux from the Crab Nebula. Applying a stacking method to the sample of non-detections with a total of 394.1 hours exposure time, we find evidence for an excess with a cumulative significance of 4.9 standard deviations. It is not dominated by individual objects or flares, but increases linearly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
