Additivity and non-additivity of multipartite entanglement measures
Huangjun Zhu, Lin Chen, Masahito Hayashi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the additivity properties of key multipartite entanglement measures, revealing conditions for additivity and non-additivity, and demonstrating that most large multipartite states are nearly maximally entangled but not strongly additive, with implications for quantum computation.
Contribution
It provides new analytical results on the additivity and non-additivity of three entanglement measures for various multipartite states, including antisymmetric and generic states.
Findings
GM is additive for states with real, non-negative entries in the computational basis.
GM is non-additive for all antisymmetric states of three or more parties.
Most large multipartite pure states are nearly maximally entangled but exhibit non-strong additivity.
Abstract
We study the additivity property of three multipartite entanglement measures, i.e. the geometric measure of entanglement (GM), the relative entropy of entanglement and the logarithmic global robustness. First, we show the additivity of GM of multipartite states with real and non-negative entries in the computational basis. Many states of experimental and theoretical interests have this property, e.g. Bell diagonal states, maximally correlated generalized Bell diagonal states, generalized Dicke states, the Smolin state, and the generalization of D\"{u}r's multipartite bound entangled states. We also prove the additivity of other two measures for some of these examples. Second, we show the non-additivity of GM of all antisymmetric states of three or more parties, and provide a unified explanation of the non-additivity of the three measures of the antisymmetric projector states. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
