Non-Equipartition of Energy, Masses of Nova Ejecta, and Type Ia Supernovae
Michael M. Shara, Ofer Yaron, Dina Prialnik, Attay Kovetz

TL;DR
This paper challenges the common assumption of energy equipartition in nova ejecta, demonstrating it leads to significant overestimates of ejected mass, and proposes a new method to accurately measure nova ejecta masses using radiated energy.
Contribution
The study shows that energy equipartition does not hold in nova ejecta and introduces a direct method to determine ejecta mass based on radiated energy and observed light curves.
Findings
Energy in nova ejecta varies widely from equipartition assumptions.
Ejected mass is directly proportional to radiated energy (E_rad).
Mass estimates based on equipartition can be overestimated by up to 10,000 times.
Abstract
The total masses ejected during classical nova eruptions are needed to answer two questions with broad astrophysical implications: Can accreting white dwarfs be pushed towards the Chandrasekhar mass limit to yield type Ia supernovae? Are Ultra-luminous red variables a new kind of astrophysical phenomenon, or merely extreme classical novae? We review the methods used to determine nova ejecta masses. Except for the unique case of BT Mon (nova 1939), all nova ejecta mass determinations depend on untested assumptions and multi-parameter modeling. The remarkably simple assumption of equipartition between kinetic and radiated energy (E_kin and E_rad, respectively) in nova ejecta has been invoked as a way around this conundrum for the ultra-luminous red variable in M31. The deduced mass is far larger than that produced by any classical nova model. Our nova eruption simulations show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
