Physical and morphological properties of z~3 LBGs: dependence on Lyalpha line emission
L.Pentericci, A. Grazian, C. Scarlata, A. Fontana, M. Castellano, E., Giallongo, E. Vanzella

TL;DR
This study examines how the physical and morphological properties of z~3 Lyman Break Galaxies depend on Lyalpha emission, revealing milder correlations than at higher redshifts and suggesting dust and hydrogen content influence Lyalpha visibility.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the dependence of physical and morphological galaxy properties on Lyalpha emission at z~3, using multi-wavelength data and non-parametric morphology diagnostics.
Findings
Galaxies without Lyalpha emission are more massive and dustier.
Physical properties show only mild dependence on Lyalpha emission.
A model with intrinsic high Lyalpha emission modulated by dust and hydrogen explains observations.
Abstract
We investigate the physical and morphological properties of LBGs at z ~2.5 to ~3.5, to determine if and how they depend on the nature and strength of the Lyalpha emission. We selected U-dropout galaxies from the z-detected GOODS MUSIC catalog, by adapting the classical Lyman Break criteria on the GOODS filter set. We kept only those galaxies with spectroscopic confirmation, mainly from VIMOS and FORS public observations. Using the full multi-wavelength 14-bands photometry, we determined the physical properties of the galaxies, through a standard spectral energy distribution fitting with the updated Charlot & Bruzual (2009) templates. We also added other relevant observations, i.e. the 24mu m observations from Spitzer/MIPS and the 2 MSec Chandra X-ray observations. Finally, using non parametric diagnostics (Gini, Concentration, Asymmetry, M_20 and ellipticity), we characterized the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
