Abell 611. II. X-ray and strong lensing analyses

TL;DR

This study compares X-ray and strong lensing methods to estimate the mass distribution of galaxy cluster Abell 611, finding good agreement in the center but discrepancies in outer regions likely due to modeling degeneracies and systematic uncertainties.

Contribution

It provides a combined analysis of X-ray and strong lensing data for Abell 611, highlighting the importance of modeling assumptions and systematics in mass estimates of galaxy clusters.

Findings

Good agreement between X-ray and lensing mass estimates within 100 kpc

Marginal disagreement in outer regions due to modeling degeneracies

Systematic errors affect temperature and mass estimates

Abstract

We present the results of our analyses of the X-ray emission and of the strong lensing systems in the relaxed galaxy cluster Abell 611 (z=0.288). We infer the X-ray mass estimate deriving the density and temperature profiles of the intra-cluster medium within the radius r ~ 700 kpc through a non-parametric approach; assuming that the cluster is in hydrostatic equilibrium and adopting a matter density profile, we can recover the total mass distribution of Abell 611 via the X-ray data. We derive the total projected mass in the central region of Abell 611 performing a parametric analysis of its strong lensing features through the publicly available analysis software Lenstool. As a final step we compare the results obtained with both methods. We derive a good agreement between the X-ray and strong lensing total mass estimates in the central region (i.e. within the radius r ~100 kpc), while a marginal disagreement is found between the two mass estimates when extrapolating the strong lensing results in the outer spatial range. We suggest that in this case the X-ray/strong lensing mass disagreement can be explained by an incorrect estimate of the relative contributions of the baryonic component and of the dark matter, caused by the intrinsic degeneracy between the different mass components in the strong lensing analysis. We discuss the effect of some possible systematic errors that influence both mass estimates. We find a slight dependence of the measurements of the X-ray temperatures (and therefore of the X-ray total masses) on the background adopted in the spectral analysis, with total deviations on the value of M_200 of the order of the 1-sigma statistical error. The strong lensing mass results are instead sensitive to the parameterisation of the galactic halo mass in the central regions, in particular to the modelling of the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) baryonic component.