Pseudo and Strongly Pseudo 2--Factor Isomorphic Regular Graphs
M. Abreu, D. Labbate, J. Sheehan

TL;DR
This paper investigates pseudo and strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic regular graphs, proving nonexistence results for certain degrees, and constructs infinite families including Flower snarks, expanding understanding of 2--factor properties in regular graphs.
Contribution
It generalizes previous nonexistence results to nonbipartite regular graphs and introduces strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic graphs, providing new constructions and conjectures.
Findings
Pseudo and strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic 2k--regular graphs do not exist for k≥4.
Flower snarks are strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic but not 2--factor isomorphic.
Conjecture: certain snarks are the only cyclically 4--edge--connected graphs with all 2--factors of odd cycles.
Abstract
A graph is pseudo 2--factor isomorphic if the parity of the number of cycles in a 2--factor is the same for all 2--factors of . In \cite{ADJLS} we proved that pseudo 2--factor isomorphic --regular bipartite graphs exist only for . In this paper we generalize this result for regular graphs which are not necessarily bipartite. We also introduce strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic graphs and we prove that pseudo and strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic 2k--regular graphs and --regular digraphs do not exist for . Moreover, we present constructions of infinite families of regular graphs in these classes. In particular we show that the family of Flower snarks is strongly pseudo 2--factor isomorphic but not 2--factor isomorphic and we conjecture that, together with the Petersen and the Blanu\v{s}a2 graphs, they are the only cyclically 4--edge--connected snarks…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
