Absence of a metallic phase in charge-neutral graphene with a random gap
J. H. Bardarson, M. V. Medvedyeva, J. Tworzydlo, A. R. Akhmerov, and, C. W. J. Beenakker

TL;DR
This study numerically investigates whether random mass fluctuations in charge-neutral graphene can induce metallic conduction, concluding that such fluctuations do not lead to a metallic phase, contrary to some recent predictions.
Contribution
The paper provides numerical evidence that random mass fluctuations do not produce a metallic phase in charge-neutral graphene, challenging recent theoretical predictions.
Findings
Random mass fluctuations do not induce metallic conduction.
A uniform mass opens an excitation gap and localizes states.
The results confirm the absence of a metallic phase in the random-gap model.
Abstract
It is known that fluctuations in the electrostatic potential allow for metallic conduction (nonzero conductivity in the limit of an infinite system) if the carriers form a single species of massless two-dimensional Dirac fermions. A nonzero uniform mass opens up an excitation gap, localizing all states at the Dirac point of charge neutrality. Here we investigate numerically whether fluctuations in the mass can have a similar effect as potential fluctuations, allowing for metallic conduction at the Dirac point. Our negative conclusion confirms earlier expectations, but does not support the recently predicted metallic phase in a random-gap model of graphene.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
