Interplay between static and dynamic polar correlations in relaxor Pb(Mg_{1/3}Nb_{2/3})O_{3}
C. Stock, L. Van Eijck, P. Fouquet, M. Maccarini, P.M. Gehring,, Guangyong Xu, H. Luo, X. Zhao, J.-F. Li, and D. Viehland

TL;DR
This study investigates the static and dynamic polar nanoregions in relaxor Pb(Mg$_{1/3}$Nb$_{2/3}$)O$_{3}$ using neutron scattering, revealing temperature-dependent behaviors linked to dielectric properties and supporting random field models.
Contribution
It provides detailed neutron scattering analysis of static and dynamic polar nanoregions in PMN, connecting microscopic dynamics with macroscopic dielectric behavior.
Findings
Static component appears at ~400 K
Dynamic component freezes at ~200 K
Dynamic intensity peaks near dielectric maximum at T$_{max}$
Abstract
We have characterized the dynamics of the polar nanoregions in Pb(MgNb)O (PMN) through high-resolution neutron backscattering and spin-echo measurements of the diffuse scattering cross section. We find that the diffuse scattering intensity consists of \emph{both} static and dynamic components. The static component first appears at the Curie temperature K, while the dynamic component freezes completely at the temperature T K; together, these components account for all of the observed spectral weight contributing to the diffuse scattering cross section. The integrated intensity of the dynamic component peaks near the temperature at which the frequency-dependent dielectric constant reaches a maximum (T) when measured at 1 GHz, i. e. on a timescale of ns. Our neutron scattering results can thus be directly related to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
