
TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of sofic equivalence relations into an operator algebraic framework, proves the equivalence of different definitions, and shows that certain group and action constructions preserve soficity.
Contribution
It introduces a new operator algebraic definition of sofic equivalence relations and demonstrates that amalgamated products of sofic groups and actions over amenable groups remain sofic.
Findings
Equivalence of graph-theoretic and operator algebraic definitions of sofic relations.
Amalgamated product of sofic actions over amenable groups is sofic.
Amalgamated product of sofic groups over an amenable subgroup is sofic.
Abstract
The notion of sofic equivalence relation was introduced by Gabor Elek and Gabor Lippner. Their technics employ some graph theory. Here we define this notion in a more operator algebraic context, starting from Connes' embedding problem, and prove the equivalence of this two definitions. We introduce a notion of sofic action for an arbitrary group and prove that amalgamated product of sofic actions over amenable groups is again sofic. We also prove that amalgamated product of sofic groups over an amenable subgroup is again sofic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
