High symmetry versus optical isotropy of a negative index metamaterial
Christoph Menzel, Andrei Andryieuski, Carsten Rockstuhl, Rumen Iliew,, Radu Malureanu, Falk Lederer, and Andrei V. Lavrinenko

TL;DR
This paper investigates the optical isotropy of a negative index metamaterial, revealing that high symmetry does not guarantee isotropy in the negative refraction spectral domain, and introduces a new analysis tool.
Contribution
It challenges the assumption that cubic symmetry ensures optical isotropy in metamaterials by analyzing the dispersion relation of a specific negative index MM.
Findings
The metamaterial is optically isotropic outside the negative refraction domain.
Optical isotropy is not guaranteed in the spectral domain of negative refraction.
A new tool for probing optical isotropy in metamaterials is introduced.
Abstract
Optically isotropic metamaterials (MMs) are required for the implementation of subwavelength imaging systems. At first glance one would expect that their design should be based on unit cells exhibiting a cubic symmetry being the highest crystal symmetry. It is anticipated that this is a sufficient condition since it is usually assumed that light does not resolve the spatial details of MM but experiences the properties of an effective medium, which is then optically isotropic. In this work we challenge this assumption by analyzing the isofrequency surfaces of the dispersion relation of the split-cube in carcass (SCiC) negative index MM. We show that this MM is basically optically isotropic, but not in the spectral domain where it exhibits negative refraction. The primary goal of this contribution is to introduce a tool that allows to probe a MM against optical isotropy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
