Through the Looking Glass: Why the "Cosmic Horizon" is not a horizon
Pim van Oirschot, Juliana Kwan, Geraint F. Lewis

TL;DR
This paper critiques the concept of the cosmic horizon in standard cosmology, analyzing alternative models and clarifying misconceptions about the Hubble sphere and event horizon.
Contribution
It evaluates alternative cosmological models and clarifies misconceptions about cosmic horizons, challenging common interpretations in standard cosmology.
Findings
The cosmic horizon is not a true horizon in cosmology.
Alternative models with w = -1/3 are examined for validity.
Misconceptions about the Hubble sphere and event horizon are addressed.
Abstract
The present standard model of cosmology, CDM, contains some intriguing coincidences. Not only are the dominant contributions to the energy density approximately of the same order at the present epoch, but we note that contrary to the emergence of cosmic acceleration as a recent phenomenon, the time averaged value of the deceleration parameter over the age of the universe is nearly zero. Curious features like these in CDM give rise to a number of alternate cosmologies being proposed to remove them, including models with an equation of state w = -1/3. In this paper, we examine the validity of some of these alternate models and we also address some persistent misconceptions about the Hubble sphere and the event horizon that lead to erroneous conclusions about cosmology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
