Optimization of Planck/LFI on--board data handling
M.Maris, M.Tomasi, S.Galeotta, M.Miccolis, S.Hildebrandt, M.Frailis,, R.Rohlfs, N.Morisset, A.Zacchei, M.Bersanelli, P.Binko, C.Burigana,, R.C.Butler, F.Cuttaia, H.Chulani, O.D'Arcangelo, S.Fogliani, E.Franceschi,, F.Gasparo, F.Gomez, A.Gregorio, J.M.Herreros, R.Leonardi

TL;DR
This paper presents an optimized onboard data processing method for the Planck/LFI instrument that reduces data rate while maintaining data quality, using an automated tuning algorithm and analytical modeling.
Contribution
It introduces an automated optimization procedure and analytical model for onboard data handling, ensuring data compression and quality requirements are met for Planck/LFI.
Findings
Achieved data rate of 35.5 Kbps with EpsilonQ at 3.8%.
Validated the optimization method during ground tests.
Provided a model for predicting processing impact based on signal statistics.
Abstract
To asses stability against 1/f noise, the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) onboard the Planck mission will acquire data at a rate much higher than the data rate allowed by its telemetry bandwith of 35.5 kbps. The data are processed by an onboard pipeline, followed onground by a reversing step. This paper illustrates the LFI scientific onboard processing to fit the allowed datarate. This is a lossy process tuned by using a set of 5 parameters Naver, r1, r2, q, O for each of the 44 LFI detectors. The paper quantifies the level of distortion introduced by the onboard processing, EpsilonQ, as a function of these parameters. It describes the method of optimizing the onboard processing chain. The tuning procedure is based on a optimization algorithm applied to unprocessed and uncompressed raw data provided either by simulations, prelaunch tests or data taken from LFI operating in diagnostic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
