Fundamental Limits of "Ankylography" due to Dimensional Deficiency
Haiqing Wei

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental limitations of ankylography, revealing that it cannot reliably reconstruct large 3D structures due to inherent dimensional deficiencies, thus restricting its practical applications.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis showing the inherent dimensional deficiency in single-shot diffractive imaging, clarifying the scope and limitations of ankylography.
Findings
Ankylography is limited to small or nearly 2D objects.
Single-shot 3D imaging faces fundamental dimensional constraints.
The method does not scale well for large 3D structures.
Abstract
Single-shot diffractive imaging of truly 3D structures suffers from a dimensional deficiency and does not scale. The applicability of "ankylography" is limited to objects that are small-sized in at least one dimension or that are essentially 2D otherwise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
