TL;DR
This paper critically examines the mathematical foundations of macrophysics related to gravity, questioning the physical significance of traditional assumptions and exploring the implications of their removal.
Contribution
It offers a philosophical and mathematical analysis of gravitational theories, challenging conventional assumptions in macrophysics.
Findings
Questioning the physical significance of traditional assumptions
Exploring the effects of removing certain mathematical assumptions
Highlighting potential shifts in gravitational theory understanding
Abstract
This paper presents reflections on the validity of a series of mathematical methods and technical assumptions that are encrusted in macrophysics (related to gravitational interaction), that seem to have little or no physical significance. It is interesting to inquire what a change can occur if one removes some of the traditional assumptions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Computational Physics and Python Applications