Are Brightest Halo Galaxies Central Galaxies?

TL;DR

This study tests the assumption that the brightest galaxy in a dark matter halo is always the central galaxy and finds that a significant fraction are actually satellites, challenging a key paradigm in galaxy formation.

Contribution

The paper provides observational evidence that the brightest halo galaxy is not always the central galaxy, quantifying the fraction of satellites among brightest galaxies across different halo masses.

Findings

The brightest halo galaxy is often a satellite, not the central.

The fraction of non-central brightest galaxies increases with halo mass.

Observed fractions are higher than theoretical predictions.

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the central galaxy in a dark matter halo, that is, the galaxy with the lowest specific potential energy, is also the brightest halo galaxy (BHG), and that it resides at rest at the centre of the dark matter potential well. This central galaxy paradigm (CGP) is an essential assumption made in various fields of astronomical research. In this paper we test the validity of the CGP using a large galaxy group catalogue constructed from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. For each group we compute two statistics, ${\cal R}$ and ${\cal S}$, which quantify the offsets of the line-of-sight velocities and projected positions of brightest group galaxies relative to the other group members. By comparing the cumulative distributions of $|{\cal R}|$ and $|{\cal S}|$ to those obtained from detailed mock group catalogues, we rule out the null-hypothesis that the CGP is correct. Rather, the data indicate that in a non-zero fraction $f_{\rm BNC}(M)$ of all haloes of mass $M$ the BHG is not the central galaxy, but instead, a satellite galaxy. In particular, we find that $f_{\rm BNC}$ increases from $\sim 0.25$ in low mass haloes ($10^{12} h^{-1} {\rm M_{\odot}} \leq M \lsim 2 \times 10^{13} h^{-1}{\rm M_{\odot}}$) to $\sim 0.4$ in massive haloes ($M \gsim 5 \times 10^{13} h^{-1} {\rm M_{\odot}}$). We show that these values of $f_{\rm BNC}$ are uncomfortably high compared to predictions from halo occupation statistics and from semi-analytical models of galaxy formation. We end by discussing various implications of a non-zero $f_{\rm BNC}(M)$, with an emphasis on the halo masses inferred from satellite kinematics.