Can solid body destruction explain abundance discrepancies in planetary nebulae?
William J. Henney (CRyA, UNAM, Mexico), Grazyna Stasinska (LUTH,, Observatoire de Paris)

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether destruction of solid bodies can explain abundance discrepancies in planetary nebulae, concluding it is unlikely during the nebula phase but possibly relevant during the earlier AGB phase.
Contribution
It provides constraints on the size and mass of solid bodies needed to explain abundance discrepancies, ruling out their destruction during the planetary nebula phase as a primary cause.
Findings
Solid body destruction during the planetary nebula phase is insufficient to explain abundance discrepancies.
The required solid body mass during the nebula phase exceeds typical cometary or debris populations.
Destruction during the AGB phase remains a plausible contributor to abundance discrepancies.
Abstract
In planetary nebulae, abundances of oxygen and other heavy elements derived from optical recombination lines are systematically higher than those derived from collisionally excited lines. We investigate the hypothesis that the destruction of solid bodies may produce pockets of cool, high-metallicity gas that could explain these abundance discrepancies. Under the assumption of maximally efficient radiative ablation, we derive two fundamental constraints that the solid bodies must satisfy in order that their evaporation during the planetary nebula phase should generate a high enough gas phase metallicity. A local constraint implies that the bodies must be larger than tens of meters, while a global constraint implies that the total mass of the solid body reservoir must exceed a few hundredths of a solar mass. This mass greatly exceeds the mass of any population of comets or large debris…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
