Superdevelopments for Weak Reduction
Eduardo Bonelli (CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes,, Argentina), Pablo Barenbaum (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina)

TL;DR
This paper investigates superdevelopments in the weak lambda calculus, introducing new reduction techniques and proving their equivalence, thereby advancing understanding of reduction processes in this constrained computational model.
Contribution
It introduces labeled and simultaneous reduction formulations for superdevelopments in the weak lambda calculus and proves their equivalence, extending the theory of reduction in this setting.
Findings
Labeled and simultaneous reduction formulations are equivalent.
Superdevelopments allow reduction of residual and newly created redexes.
New redex creation mechanisms are identified in the weak lambda calculus.
Abstract
We study superdevelopments in the weak lambda calculus of Cagman and Hindley, a confluent variant of the standard weak lambda calculus in which reduction below lambdas is forbidden. In contrast to developments, a superdevelopment from a term M allows not only residuals of redexes in M to be reduced but also some newly created ones. In the lambda calculus there are three ways new redexes may be created; in the weak lambda calculus a new form of redex creation is possible. We present labeled and simultaneous reduction formulations of superdevelopments for the weak lambda calculus and prove them equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic
