Extensional and Intensional Strategies
Tony Bourdier (INRIA Nancy Grand-Est), Horatiu Cirstea (INRIA Nancy, Grand-Est), Daniel Dougherty (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), H\'el\`ene, Kirchner (INRIA Bordeaux Sud-Ouest)

TL;DR
This paper explores the theoretical foundations of strategies by defining extensional and intensional strategies, characterizing their relationship, and discussing potential logical characterizations and future directions.
Contribution
It introduces a general framework for extensional and intensional strategies, characterizes their relationship, and suggests avenues for logical characterization.
Findings
Characterization of extensional strategies definable intensively
Framework connecting abstract and operational strategies
Discussion of logical perspectives on intensional strategies
Abstract
This paper is a contribution to the theoretical foundations of strategies. We first present a general definition of abstract strategies which is extensional in the sense that a strategy is defined explicitly as a set of derivations of an abstract reduction system. We then move to a more intensional definition supporting the abstract view but more operational in the sense that it describes a means for determining such a set. We characterize the class of extensional strategies that can be defined intensionally. We also give some hints towards a logical characterization of intensional strategies and propose a few challenging perspectives.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
