Accreted versus In Situ Milky Way Globular Clusters
Duncan A. Forbes, Terry Bridges

TL;DR
This study analyzes the ages and metallicities of Milky Way globular clusters to estimate the proportion formed in situ versus accreted from dwarf galaxies, revealing distinct formation histories and accretion signatures.
Contribution
It provides a detailed chemical and orbital analysis of Milky Way GCs, estimating that about a quarter were accreted from dwarf galaxies, and identifies signatures of accretion in their properties.
Findings
Approximately 25% of GCs are accreted from dwarf galaxies.
Young track GCs often have retrograde orbits, indicating accretion.
Several GCs align with satellite galaxy streams, supporting accretion origins.
Abstract
Here we examine the Milky Way's GC system to estimate the fraction of accreted versus in situ formed GCs. We first assemble a high quality database of ages and metallicities for 93 Milky Way GCs from literature deep colour-magnitude data. The age-metallicity relation for the Milky Way's GCs reveals two distinct tracks -- one with near constant old age of ~12.8 Gyr and the other branches to younger ages. We find that the latter young track is dominated by globular clusters associated with the Sagittarius and Canis Major dwarf galaxies. Despite being overly simplistic, its age-metallicity relation can be well represented by a simple closed box model with continuous star formation. The inferred chemical enrichment history is similar to that of the Large Magellanic Cloud, but is more enriched, at a given age, compared to the Small Magellanic Cloud. After excluding Sagittarius and Canis…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
