The Rise and Fall of Type Ia Supernova Light Curves in the SDSS-II Supernova Survey
Brian T. Hayden, Peter M. Garnavich, Richard Kessler, Joshua A., Frieman, Saurabh W. Jha, David Cinabro, Benjamin Dilday, Daniel Kasen, John, Marriner, Robert C. Nichol, Adam G. Riess, Masao Sako, Donald P. Schneider,, Mathew Smith, Jesper Sollerman, Bruce Bassett

TL;DR
This study analyzes the rise and fall times of Type Ia supernova light curves from SDSS-II, revealing that a two-stretch model better captures their diversity and that rise times are shorter than previously thought, with no correlation to host galaxy properties.
Contribution
Introduces a 2-stretch fitting method for supernova light curves, improving modeling of rise and fall times independently and challenging the single 'stretch' correction approach.
Findings
Average rise time is 17.38 days, shorter than previous estimates.
Broad, single-peaked distribution of rise minus fall times contrasts earlier bimodal suggestions.
No correlation between rise-fall time differences and host galaxy properties or Hubble residuals.
Abstract
We analyze the rise and fall times of type Ia supernova (SN Ia) light curves discovered by the SDSS-II Supernova Survey. From a set of 391 light curves k-corrected to the rest frame B and V bands, we find a smaller dispersion in the rising portion of the light curve compared to the decline. This is in qualitative agreement with computer models which predict that variations in radioactive nickel yield have less impact on the rise than on the spread of the decline rates. The differences we find in the rise and fall properties suggest that a single 'stretch' correction to the light curve phase does not properly model the range of SN Ia light curve shapes. We select a subset of 105 light curves well-observed in both rise and fall portions of the light curves and develop a '2-stretch' fit algorithm which estimates the rise and fall times independently. We find the average time from explosion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
