Absorbing phase transitions in deterministic fixed-energy sandpile models
Su-Chan Park

TL;DR
This paper explores the nature of absorbing phase transitions in deterministic fixed-energy sandpile models, revealing multiple thresholds, their dependence on initial conditions, and their relation to percolation phenomena, contrasting with self-organized criticality.
Contribution
It demonstrates the existence of multiple transition points in deterministic fixed-energy sandpiles and clarifies their universality and dependence on initial configurations and limits.
Findings
Multiple thresholds depend on initial conditions.
Critical phenomena are universal across thresholds.
Transition relates to dynamical percolation, not self-organized criticality.
Abstract
We investigate the origin of the difference, which was noticed by Fey {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 104}, 145703 (2010)], between the steady state density of an Abelian sandpile model (ASM) and the transition point of its corresponding deterministic fixed-energy sandpile model (DFES). Being deterministic, the configuration space of a DFES can be divided into two disjoint classes such that every configuration in one class should evolve into one of absorbing states, whereas no configurations in the other class can reach an absorbing state. Since the two classes are separated in terms of toppling dynamics, the system can be made to exhibit an absorbing phase transition (APT) at various points that depend on the initial probability distribution of the configurations. Furthermore, we show that in general the transition point also depends on whether an infinite-size limit is taken…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
