Why Everettians Should Appreciate the Transactional Interpretation
R. E. Kastner, John G. Cramer

TL;DR
The paper argues that the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics offers a conceptually clearer and more realist alternative to the Everett interpretation, avoiding many conceptual difficulties associated with observer-centric views.
Contribution
It demonstrates that TI, especially in its possibilist form, aligns with realist principles and simplifies understanding quantum phenomena without invoking observers or consciousness.
Findings
TI does not require observers or consciousness.
PTI treats state branches as real dynamical entities.
Born probability emerges naturally in TI.
Abstract
The attractive feature of the Everett approach is its admirable spirit of approaching the quantum puzzle with a Zen-like "beginner's mind" in order to try to envision what the pure formalism might be saying about quantum reality, even if that journey leads to a strange place. It is argued that the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TI), appropriately interpreted, shares the same motivation and achieves much more, with far fewer conceptual perplexities, by taking into account heretofore overlooked features of the quantum formalism itself (i.e. advanced states). In particular, TI does not need to talk about brain states, consciousness, or observers (rational or otherwise). In its possibilist variant ("PTI"), it shares the realist virtues of treating state vector branches as genuine dynamical entities, without having to explain how or why all of their associated outcomes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Origins and Evolution of Life
