Relaxation Penalties and Priors for Plausible Modeling of Nonidentified Bias Sources
Sander Greenland

TL;DR
This paper proposes a modeling approach using relaxation penalties and priors to handle nonidentified bias sources in observational studies, enabling plausible sensitivity analyses when target parameters are not directly identifiable.
Contribution
It introduces a framework that replaces implausible point-mass constraints with penalty functions from plausible priors, facilitating sensitivity analysis in nonidentified models.
Findings
Models can be fit within familiar likelihood frameworks.
Sensitivity analysis demonstrates limitations of observational data.
Extensions to complex biases are outlined.
Abstract
In designed experiments and surveys, known laws or design feat ures provide checks on the most relevant aspects of a model and identify the target parameters. In contrast, in most observational studies in the health and social sciences, the primary study data do not identify and may not even bound target parameters. Discrepancies between target and analogous identified parameters (biases) are then of paramount concern, which forces a major shift in modeling strategies. Conventional approaches are based on conditional testing of equality constraints, which correspond to implausible point-mass priors. When these constraints are not identified by available data, however, no such testing is possible. In response, implausible constraints can be relaxed into penalty functions derived from plausible prior distributions. The resulting models can be fit within familiar full or partial likelihood…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
