Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
Gary M. Bernstein

TL;DR
This paper identifies and addresses key biases in galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing, introducing a new method that confines analysis to observable k-space regions, significantly reducing biases and improving accuracy.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel shape-measurement technique that minimizes underfitting and ellipticity gradient biases by focusing on observable k-space regions, achieving high accuracy without recalibration.
Findings
Biases are caused by high-frequency information loss and ellipticity gradients.
The new method reduces biases by factors of 20-100.
Achieves shear estimation errors below 1 part in 1000, outperforming previous methods.
Abstract
Precision weak gravitational lensing experiments require measurements of galaxy shapes accurate to <1 part in 1000. We investigate measurement biases, noted by Voigt and Bridle (2009) and Melchior et al. (2009), that are common to shape measurement methodologies that rely upon fitting elliptical-isophote galaxy models to observed data. The first bias arises when the true galaxy shapes do not match the models being fit. We show that this "underfitting bias" is due, at root, to these methods' attempts to use information at high spatial frequencies that has been destroyed by the convolution with the point-spread function (PSF) and/or by sampling. We propose a new shape-measurement technique that is explicitly confined to observable regions of k-space. A second bias arises for galaxies whose ellipticity varies with radius. For most shape-measurement methods, such galaxies are subject to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
