Variations in Integrated Galactic Initial Mass Functions due to Sampling Method and Cluster Mass Function
M. R. Haas (1), P. Anders (2) ((1) Leiden Observatory, Leiden, University, (2) Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University)

TL;DR
This study examines how different sampling methods and cluster mass functions influence the integrated galactic initial mass function (IGIMF), revealing significant variability and implications for galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It compares various sampling techniques and CMFs to quantify their effects on the IGIMF, highlighting uncertainties in star formation modeling.
Findings
Sampling methods significantly affect the steepening of the IGIMF.
The effect varies with the lower cluster mass limit and CMF slope.
Observations like GAIA O-star counts can help constrain models.
Abstract
[abridged] Stars are thought to be formed predominantly in clusters. The clusters are formed following a cluster initial mass function (CMF) similar to the stellar initial mass function (IMF). Both the IMF and the CMF favour low-mass objects. The numerous low-mass clusters will lack high mass stars. If the integrated galactic initial mass function originates from stars formed in clusters, the IGIMF could be steeper than the IMF. We investigate how well constrained this steepening is and how it depends on the choice of sampling method and CMF. We compare analytic sampling to several implementations of random sampling of the IMF, and different CMFs. We implement different IGIMFs into GALEV to obtain colours and metallicities for galaxies. Choosing different ways of sampling the IMF results in different IGIMFs. Depending on the lower cluster mass limit and the slope of the cluster mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
