Discovery of Compton-thick quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
C. Vignali (1,2), D.M. Alexander (3), R. Gilli (2), F. Pozzi (1) ((1), Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita` degli Studi di Bologna, Italy; (2), INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Italy; (3) Department of Physics,, Durham University, UK)

TL;DR
This study investigates the prevalence of Compton-thick quasars among SDSS Type 2 quasars using X-ray and infrared data, revealing a significant obscured population consistent with X-ray background models.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive X-ray coverage of SDSS Type 2 quasars and estimates the fraction of Compton-thick quasars using multiwavelength data.
Findings
Approximately 65% of SDSS Type 2 quasars may be Compton-thick.
About 50% of these quasars are obscured by Compton-thick material based on IR and X-ray ratios.
The estimated number density aligns with X-ray background model predictions.
Abstract
We present new and archival Chandra snapshot (10 ks each) observations of 15 optically identified (from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, SDSS) Type 2 quasars at z=0.40-0.73. When combined with existing X-ray data, this work provides complete X-ray coverage for all 25 radio-quiet Type 2 quasars with logL_[OIII]>9.28 L_sun from Zakamska et al. (2003). Two targets out of 15 were not detected by Chandra and most of the remaining sources are X-ray weak, with nine having less than 10 counts in the 0.5-8keV band. Low-to-moderate quality spectral analysis was limited to three sources, whose properties are consistent with the presence of column densities in the range NH~10^22-10^23 cm^-2 in the source rest frame. If the [OIII] luminosity is a reliable proxy for the intrinsic X-ray luminosity, the current X-ray data indicate that Compton-thick quasars may hide among ~65 per cent of the SDSS Type 2…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
