How not to share a set of secrets
K. R. Sahasranand, Nithin Nagaraj, S. Rajan

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a space-efficient secret sharing scheme, identifies its vulnerabilities, compares it with Krawczyk's scheme, and introduces two new attack methods highlighting the importance of randomness in security.
Contribution
It reveals vulnerabilities in an existing secret sharing scheme, advocates for Krawczyk's scheme as a robust alternative, and proposes novel attack strategies under specific assumptions.
Findings
Existing scheme fails for certain secret sets
Krawczyk's scheme is space optimal and universally applicable
Two new attack methods exploit lack of randomness
Abstract
This note analyses one of the existing space efficient secret sharing schemes and suggests vulnerabilities in its design. We observe that the said algorithm fails for certain choices of the set of secrets and there is no reason for preferring this particular scheme over alternative schemes. The paper also elaborates the adoption of a scheme proposed by Hugo Krawczyk as an extension of Shamir's scheme, for a set of secrets. Such an implementation is space optimal and works for all choices of secrets. We also propose two new methods of attack which are valid under certain assumptions and observe that it is the elimination of random values that facilitates these kinds of attacks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption · Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
