Gravitational recoil: effects on massive black hole occupation fraction over cosmic time
Marta Volonteri, Kayhan Gultekin, Massimo Dotti

TL;DR
This paper investigates how gravitational recoil from black hole mergers affects the likelihood of galaxies, especially small ones, retaining their massive black holes over cosmic time, considering different galaxy environments and merger configurations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of black hole ejection probabilities across cosmic history, highlighting the impact of galaxy environment, merger type, and black hole formation on black hole occupation fractions.
Findings
Small halos have high ejection probabilities due to shallow potential wells.
Recoils can reduce black hole presence in small galaxies to about 60%.
Large galaxies are less affected, with at most 20% reduction in black hole occupation.
Abstract
We assess the influence of massive black hole (MBH) ejections from galaxy centres, due to the gravitational radiation recoil, along the cosmic merger history of the MBH population. We discuss the 'danger' of the recoil for MBHs as a function of different MBH spin/orbit configurations and of the host halo cosmic bias, and on how that reflects on the 'occupation fraction' of MBHs. We assess ejection probabilities for mergers occurring in a gas-poor environment, where the MBH binary coalescence is driven by stellar dynamical processes, and the spin/orbit configuration is expected to be isotropically distributed. We contrast this case with the 'aligned' case. The latter is the most realistic situation for 'wet', gas-rich mergers, which are the expectation for high-redshift galaxies. We find that if all halos at z>5-7 host a MBH, the probability of the Milky Way (or similar size galaxy) to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
