On the Pseudocodeword Redundancy
Jens Zumbragel, Mark F. Flanagan, and Vitaly Skachek

TL;DR
This paper investigates the minimal number of parity-check equations needed for a code's pseudoweight to match its minimum Hamming distance, revealing that many codes lack finite pseudocodeword redundancy and providing bounds for certain code families.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of pseudocodeword redundancy for different channels and establishes that most codes do not have finite values, offering bounds for specific code families.
Findings
Most codes do not have finite pseudocodeword redundancy.
Bounds are provided for codes based on designs.
The minimal number of parity-checks for certain pseudoweights is characterized.
Abstract
We define the AWGNC, BSC, and max-fractional pseudocodeword redundancy of a code as the smallest number of rows in a parity-check matrix such that the corresponding minimum pseudoweight is equal to the minimum Hamming distance. We show that most codes do not have a finite pseudocodeword redundancy. We also provide bounds on the pseudocodeword redundancy for some families of codes, including codes based on designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsError Correcting Code Techniques · Coding theory and cryptography · Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
