Numerical Testing of The Rare Earth Hypothesis using Monte Carlo Realisation Techniques
Duncan H. Forgan (1), Ken Rice (1) ((1) SUPA, Institute for, Astronomy, University of Edinburgh)

TL;DR
This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the Rare Earth Hypothesis, suggesting intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations are likely rare and often unconnected, but some may be strongly linked, offering nuanced insights for SETI.
Contribution
It introduces Monte Carlo Realisation Techniques to quantitatively test the Rare Earth Hypothesis and compares it with more optimistic scenarios, revealing potential for contact despite overall rarity.
Findings
Intelligent civilizations are likely rare under the Rare Earth Hypothesis.
Most civilization pairs cannot exchange signals within their lifetimes.
Some civilization pairs are strongly connected, enabling multiple signal exchanges.
Abstract
The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) has thus far failed to provide a convincing detection of intelligent life. In the wake of this null signal, many "contact pessimistic" hypotheses have been formulated, the most famous of which is the Rare Earth Hypothesis. It postulates that although terrestrial planets may be common, the exact environmental conditions that Earth enjoys are rare, perhaps unique. As a result, simple microbial life may be common, but complex metazoans (and hence intelligence) will be rare. This paper uses Monte Carlo Realisation Techniques to investigate the Rare Earth Hypothesis, in particular the environmental criteria considered imperative to the existence of intelligence on Earth. By comparing with a less restrictive, more optimistic hypothesis, the data indicates that if the Rare Earth hypothesis is correct, intelligent civilisation will indeed be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
