The error budget of the Dark Flow measurement
F. Atrio-Barandela, A. Kashlinsky, H. Ebeling, D. Kocevski, A. Edge

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the uncertainties and systematics in Dark Flow measurements using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, confirming the significance of the detected bulk flow and analyzing potential contaminations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed error budget analysis for Dark Flow measurements, clarifying the impact of systematics and confirming the robustness of the observed bulk flow.
Findings
Errors for 5-year WMAP data are approximately 15√3/N_clusters μK per dipole component.
Bulk flow velocity is significant at >99.95% confidence level.
Systematic effects are unlikely to account for the observed signal.
Abstract
We analyze the uncertainties and possible systematics associated with the "Dark Flow" measurements using the cumulative Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect combined with all-sky catalogs of clusters of galaxies. Filtering of all-sky cosmic microwave background (CMB) maps is required to remove the intrinsic cosmological signal down to the limit imposed by cosmic variance. Contributions to the errors come from the remaining cosmological signal, that integrates down with the number of clusters, and the instrumental noise, that scales with the number of pixels; the latter decreases with integration time and is subdominant for the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 5-year data. It is proven both analytically and numerically that the errors for 5-year WMAP data are K per dipole component. The measured bulk flow velocity is significant at up to the …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
