Neutrino Constraints on Inelastic Dark Matter after CDMS II
Jing Shu, Peng-fei Yin, Shou-hua Zhu

TL;DR
This paper examines how neutrino observations from the Sun and Earth constrain inelastic dark matter models that aim to reconcile DAMA/LIBRA results with other experiments, focusing on annihilation channels and mass parameters.
Contribution
It provides updated neutrino-based constraints on inelastic dark matter models, considering recent CDMS II data and exploring the impact of different annihilation channels and mass splittings.
Findings
Super-Kamiokande excludes certain annihilation channels like W+W-, ZZ, t-tbar, and tau+ tau-.
Future IceCube plus DeepCore can test or constrain soft channels such as b-bbar and c-cbar.
Constraints on Earth-based annihilation are limited to small mass splittings and specific mass ranges.
Abstract
We discuss the neutrino constraints from solar and terrestrial dark matter (DM) annihilations in the inelastic dark matter (iDM) scenario after the recent CDMS II results. To reconcile the DAMA/LIBRA data with constraints from all other direct experiments, the iDM needs to be light ( GeV) and have a large DM-nucleon cross section ( 10 pb in the spin-independent (SI) scattering and 10 pb in the spin-dependent (SD) scattering). The dominant contribution to the iDM capture in the Sun is from scattering off Fe/Al in the SI/SD case. Current bounds from Super-Kamiokande exclude the hard DM annihilation channels, such as , , and . For soft channels such as and , the limits are loose, but could be tested or further constrained by future IceCube plus DeepCore. For neutrino constraints…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
