Electronic structure of Fe1.04(Te0.66Se0.34)
Fei Chen, Bo Zhou, Yan Zhang, Jia Wei, Hong-Wei Ou, Jia-Feng Zhao,, Cheng He, Qing-Qin Ge, Masashi Arita, Kenya Shimada, Hirofumi Namatame,, Masaki Taniguchi, Zhong-Yi Lu, Jiangping Hu, Xiao-Yu Cui, D. L. Feng

TL;DR
This study investigates the electronic structure of Fe1.04(Te0.66Se0.34) using photoemission spectroscopy and density functional theory, revealing similarities and key differences with iron-pnictides, especially near the Gamma-point.
Contribution
First combined high-resolution ARPES and DFT analysis of Fe1.04(Te0.66Se0.34), highlighting its electronic structure and differences from iron-pnictides.
Findings
Three distinct bands cross the Fermi level near the zone center.
Presence of a hole-like elliptical Fermi surface at the zone center.
No evidence of spin density wave in the electronic structure.
Abstract
We report the electronic structure of the iron-chalcogenide superconductor, Fe1.04(Te0.66Se0.34), obtained with high resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and density functional calculations. In photoemission measurements, various photon energies and polarizations are exploited to study the Fermi surface topology and symmetry properties of the bands. The measured band structure and their symmetry characters qualitatively agree with our density function theory calculations of Fe(Te0.66Se0.34), although the band structure is renormalized by about a factor of three. We find that the electronic structures of this iron-chalcogenides and the iron-pnictides have many aspects in common, however, significant differences exist near the Gamma-point. For Fe1.04(Te0.66Se0.34), there are clearly separated three bands with distinct even or odd symmetry that cross the Fermi energy (EF)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
